The "Haussmannization" of Paris replaced much of ancienne Paris with broad boulevards, parks and vistas, largely creating the Paris we know today.

The Transformation of Paris

In the span of two decades in the mid-19th Century, Paris was fundamentally transformed to a modern city. Entire neighborhoods were "pierced,"  and an estimated one-third of the antiquities of Paris were decimated. In its place came broad boulevards, parks and vistas, largely shaping the Paris we know today. This became known as the "Haussmannization" of Paris, after Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann, Prefect of the Seine, who carried out the transformation plan for Emperor Napoleon III. 

Marville's Finger of Death

During the transformation of Paris in the 1850s and 1860s, the lens of Charles Marvillle’s camera was called the “finger of death.” Wherever he pointed it, a building or an entire neighborhood soon was demolished. Now, his work shines a “ray of light” on ancienne Paris.

The Second Empire was an autocrat’s dream. For two decades, Emperor Napoleon III ruled France with minimal limits on his power. The most notable achievements of his reign was the wholesale renovation of Paris. Under his plan, carried out from 1853 to 1870, the city was transformed from a tangle of Medieval streets into a boulevard-laced jewel for the bedazzlement of the greater invited world.

In carrying out the emperor's plan, Haussmann moved boldly and flaunted an unbridled sense of entitlement. He answered to no one, save the Emperor, and his colossal financial expenditures were unknown even to Parlement. To this day, Haussmann is denounced by progressive urbanists the world over, but in the case of Paris…eh bien, he won. The Paris we know today is largely the Paris that Haussmann created.

But fortunately, we have Marville.

Marville was engaged by the city to document the transformation of Paris through the nascent craft of photography. Marville’s mandate was, in large part, to demonstrate the wretchedness of the ancienne neighborhoods that Haussmann planned to remove. He replaced them with wide boulevards that let in air and light, and and he provided running water and sanitary sewers.

No doubt, good things came from Haussmann’s plan. Despite this, Haussmannization is anathema to contemporary proponents of "layered" urban renewal that preserves diverse architectural styles and respects community vitality.

Baron Georges-Eugène Haussmann, Prefect of the Seine, supervised the transformation largely from his office and from demolition site visits where he seldom ventured out of his carriage. 

"Artiste Démolitioner"

Haussmann cared little for public opinion. He fancied himself an “artiste démolitionier,” and he delighted in “piercing” neighborhoods that he deemed warrens of filth and sedition.

In his 17-year run, he and his army of 60,000 workers literally blasted away an estimated one-third of Paris’ antiquities. This included the destruction of 20,000 building containing 120,000 lodgings, and the addition of 34,000 new buildings with 215,000 new lodgings. He laid 71 miles of new streets, 400 miles of new pavements and 240 miles of new sewers.

The human toll: 350,000 Parisians were displaced.

The economic toll: 2.5 billion francs.

And Marville was there to document what supporters of Haussmann call his improvements and what critics call his “urban war crimes.”

Les Deux Portes, Rue des Innocents
Photograph by Charles Marville

Charles Marville: The City's Photographer

Charles Marville (1813-1879) was born Charles François Bossu. He was born in Paris and lived his entire life there. He trained as a painter and illustrator and became a photographer around 1850.

Marville had two tours of duty as an official photographer of Paris. Initially, he was engaged by the city in 1856 to document neighborhoods marked for destruction and replacement. In 1862, he was named “official photographer of Paris,” a title that he proudly displayed over the entrance to his studio.

The time parameters of Marville’s assignment are not well known, as records as well as Marville’s original prints were destroyed when revolutionaries burned the Hotel de Ville in 1871). What is clear is that in 1865, Marville became part of the Travaux Historiques, or the Permanent Subcommittee on Historic Works, overseen by the City Council. His work was included in its publication of "Historique General de Paris in 1866.” In 1873, Marville again worked with the Travaux Historique, reprinting 425 of his “vues de vieux Paris” that were destroyed in the City Hall fire.

In 1877, Marville was commissioned to document the new construction—or in many cases the open spaces, boulevards and parks—that occupied the neighborhoods now gone. A great deal of his photos detail new hardware of the street, so to speak: lamp posts, benches and pissoirs. These were signs of modernity, and Marville photographed them in a manner fit for a museum.

Marville’s photographs, both early and later, are remarkable as documents of quotidian detail and are just as striking in their unemotional quality. They contrast with the later work of Eugene Atget, with whom Marville is often grouped. Atget seems to wring emotion (generally nostalgia) from every patch of fog; Marville projects a clinical clarity.

Marville’s photographic method was to take two shots of an intersection or street, from different vantage points, and often from the center of the street. His camera was placed low, as was his subject matter, favoring puddles and cobblestones over rooftops and sky. He was apparently an early riser, as most streets are devoid of people, barren of activity, though a pushcart or empty café table suggests that at any moment the scene could be flooded with a bustling crowd. The photos are pregnant with expectation.

Marville's photographs also hold a sadness; his visual documentation is all we have left of the streets of Victor Hugo, Eugene Sue and Henri Mugler. We no longer can walk lost streets, but we think we know them from the words of these and other Parisian writers and from the images of Marville.

Charles Meryon captured much of the same disappearing Paris as Marville--but with etchings and drawings. 
Turellem Rue de l’Ecole de Medecine (1861) by Charles Meryon

Charles Meryon

In contrast with the clinical clarity of Charles Marville are the etchings of Charles Meryon (1821-1868). Meryon worked at roughly this same period. For our examination, consider two works in particular:

La Rue de Mauvais Garcons (1854) conveys a threatening feeling in the darkly drawn figures that lurk at the perimeter of the scene.

Turellem Rue de l’Ecole de Medecine (1861) presents a bustling tableau of economic life in a cluster of well-dressed shoppers crowding an intersection: A wagon is piled high with goods, the window of an an epicure is filled with foods, a vendor hoists his wears atop his head while pausing to speak to a woman and small child, and. Mryon shows everything Marville does not: streets in use, with purpose, chaos, life.

Taken together, the works of Maryon and Marville comprise  the impression of Paris—the ancienne Paris—that many visitors hold in their minds is of streets they never have seen but imagine they have seen.

This bend in time and place is what Zola describes in “Le Ventre de Paris” (The Belly of Paris), published in 1873. His protagonist Florent, after 20 years away from Paris, in hiding, returns to his old neighborhood of Les Halles. He finds the spanking new market with its cast iron pillars and glass ceilings foreign and disorienting; he struggles to recognize his whereabouts in his own quartier.

This psychic pain of confusion over place reveals a classic theme in the life and people of Paris: the tension between people and state in determining community. Paris as state can carve out 20 arrondissements, each with its own marie and local officials. It holds the power to eviscerate markets and cafes where human life happens—and create a political division, designated a zone as industrial or residential. But a quartier is created by les citoyens, organically, not by decree.

Such quarrels are as alive today as they were in the ancienne city; conflicts, sometimes violent, arose with each wave of development, growth, decay, renewal. Today’s laws regarding the inclusion of public housing as a percentage of urban development are rooted in May 1968, in Zola, in Baudelaire.

Street names are political—and as such they bend to political winds. What city other than Paris would name a street after the dadaist Tristan Tzara, or a parking garage after the Enlightenment philosophe Denis Diderot? The international effect of Black Lives Matter has fueled a movement in Paris to confront history and rename streets and statues that honor colonizers and rebellion quellers.

Power has its ebbs and flows, and even for autocrats all good things must come to an end, and this held true for the Second Empire. Napoleon III engineered his own undoing in 1870, when he launched a war against Prussia with nationalist hubris outweighing military preparation. The Emperor was captured in losing the battle of Sedan. He was held captive for eight months before he negotiated an exile to England where he had to sell his jewels and properties to scrape by. Two years later, he died in England and is buried there.

Haussmann had met his own demise by early 1870. A secret plan that Haussmann had drawn up came to light: Rapid population growth would be accommodated by removing bodies from city cemeteries and developing the land. The exhumed remains would be moved to a new necropolis far out of town, on property that Haussmann had (secretly) secured. An ensuing scandal forced him from office. Following that, an investigation of his expenditures revealed a breathtaking level of debt that would require the next 50 years for the municipal government of Paris to fully pay off.

Parc Monceau neighborhood

Fortunes Were Made in Paris Real Estate

Historians are pretty much in agreement that while Haussmann lived a lavish lifestyle—the plush carriage, the many servants, elegant evenings at the Opera with his bejeweled mistress—he was not, as might be expected, “on the take.” However, a gaggle of his cronies made fortunes from real estate speculation, and their key to buying low and selling high was to know what buildings Marville’s camera (“the finger of death”) was pointed at.

The inside game: Speculators would purchase properties they knew were about to be demolished. Haussmann, on behalf of the city, then overpaid the speculators for them. Once a neighborhood had been “pierced” and cleared, speculators (sometimes the same people) would buy and develop the vacant property; they scored coming and going.

As for the residents of those destroyed neighborhoods? They were forced to the outer faubourgs (working class suburbs) of Paris, in search of affordable housing. Over time, those faubourgs were incorporated into Paris, but the transfer of low-income Parisians from core to perimeter had been achieved.

Following his removal from office, Haussmann lived another 22 years, during which time he penned a voluminous “Memoires du Baron Haussmann” that is filled with self-praise for his success in a transforming Paris into a "magnificent city." 

At this same time, the last three decades of the 19th century, Paris experienced a colossal building boom. Boulevards were lined with the luxury apartment buildings we see today. The Opera Garnier opened to great fanfare. Galleries Lafayette and the expanded Printemps flooded the Grands Boulevards with shoppers. Great fortunes were made. And Haussmann had paved the way for all of it.

Over the past century and a half, Haussmanization has morphed from a historic event to a verb indicating callous urban transformation and even “infrastructure violence.” It is used to describe transformation of cities around the world, from Rio to Mexico City. In New York, Robert Moses, “the Power Broker,” went to school on Haussmann and perfected his technique: Answer only to the big boss, keep your finances above review, give the people parks, and make no apologies for progress, especially if it eliminates congestion.


Before and After

Marville’s extraordinary contribution was that he captured two rounds of detailed documentation, showing the before-and-after chronology of urban transformation. We see ancienne Paris and nouveau Paris and both are rendered with consummate professionalism and style.

Marville can now be thought of as a kind of “first urbanist anthropologist,” wielding the relatively new invention of photography. What was called a “finger of death” now provides a “ray of light” into a massive urban transformation.


Rue Tirrechape (disappeared)
Photograph by Charles Marville


Resources

Piercing Time: Paris After Marville and Atget 1865-2012,  (2013)
by Peter Sramek

Marville Paris (1994)
by Marie de Thézy

Charles Marville Photographs of Paris 1852-1878 
Exhibit catalog of Musée Carnavalet French Institute / Alliance Francaise (1981)

Charles Meryon: A Life (1999)
by Roger Collins

Walks Through Lost Paris (2006)
by Leonard Pitt 

Parisian Views (1997)
by Shelley Rice

--